cultural cognition project papers

Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus

admin — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:40:56 +0000

Why doesn't "scientific consensus" settle disputes about climate change and other issues? The answer, a CCP experimental study suggests, is not that only some citizens view scientific opinion as important, but rather that citizens of diverse cultural outlooks form different perceptions of what most scientists believe.

Fixing the Communications Failure

admin — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:49:26 +0000

There is a culture war in America over science. Why? And what should be done to promote the ability of culturally diverse citizens to agree on how science can inform their common interests in health, security, and prosperity? This article, published in Nature, uses the findings of Cultural Cognition Project studies to address these questions.

Nanotechnology and society: The evolution of risk perceptions

admin — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:51:29 +0000

What do we now know about public perceptions of the risks of nanotechnology? What do we have good reason to expect about how those perceptions will evolve? A brief commentary, published in Nature Nanotechnology, addresses these questions. The commentary also identifies appropriate steps to extend investigation of nanotechnology risk perceptions and discusses the contribution this form of study makes to understanding of public risk perceptions and communication generally.

Some Realism about Punishment Naturalism

admin — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:54:00 +0000

Where do our intuitions about wrongdoing come from? In this paper, we critique punishment naturalism -- the notion that such intuitions are independent of culture. By way of contrast we describe an alternative approach, punishment realism, that develops the core insights of legal realism via psychology and anthropology. Punishment realism, we argue, offers a more complete account of agreement and disagreement over the criminal law and provides a more detailed and credible account of the social and cognitive mechanisms that move people to either agree or disagree with one another on whether and how much praise or punishment a given act deserves. The differences between these two empirical accounts also entail contrasting implications for how those interested in maximizing social welfare and public satisfaction with the law should approach questions of crime and punishment.

Culture, Cognition, and Consent: Who Perceives What, and Why, in "Acquaintance Rape" Cases

admin — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:58:00 +0000

How the law defines rape, a CCP study finds, matters much less than decisionmakers' cultural predispositions, which shape their perceptions of consent and other facts in "date rape" cases (forthcoming, University of Pennsylvania Law Review).

Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn't, and Why? An Experimental Study

admin — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:53:00 +0000

Is the controversy over the mandatory vaccination of school girls for HPV a cultural one? Yes, because what and whom individuals believe about the risks and benefits of the vaccine, experimental data show, are shaped by their cultural commitments.

First Report on Gay and Lesbian Parenting

admin — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:53:00 +0000

This report on stage one of a three-stage study details who holds which factual beliefs about gay and lesbian parenting. Project members are using the information in this study to help us develop hypotheses and strategies for stages two and three.

Cultural Cognition and Public Policy

admin — Mon, 11 May 2009 06:51:00 +0000

How does cultural conflict influence public policymaking? Surprisingly, not by generating moral disputes over the ends to be pursued by law but rather by generating empirical disagreements over the consequences of economic, crime-control, national security, and other policies designed to promote our common interests.

Whose Eyes Are You Going to Believe? An Empirical Examination of Scott v. Harris

admin — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:26:00 +0000

Based on a video shot from inside a police cruiser, the U.S. Supreme court concluded "no reasonable juror" could find that the risk posed by a fleeing motorist did not warrant deadly force (the deliberate ramming of his car) to stop him. But a study by the Cultural Cognition Project (published in the Harvard Law Review) finds that perceptions of risk among persons who viewed the tape were highly conditional on those persons' cultural worldviews.

Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect

admin — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:52:00 +0000

The "white male effect" refers to the until-now unexplained tendency of white males to fear all manner of risk less than women and minorities. Published in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, this paper reports the results of an empirical study finding that that "the white male effect" derives from the tendency of individuals to form risk perceptions protective of identities they enjoy by virtue of cultural norms that feature race- and gender-differentiation in roles relating to putatively dangerous activities.